Battlefield Wiki
Advertisement
Battlefield Wiki

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Battlefield Series Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Cold War (level page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Bondpedia (Talk) 21:25, 9 March 2010

BC2 Single Player

Sure, go ahead. Doc.Richtofen

levels

Thanks, I'm making a template aswell containing the levels, there might be a few red links though xD After I dig up some info we'll spruce that singleplayer up =D Smuff 18:56, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, well I'll finish the template now that I have the list, thanks =D Smuff 19:33, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

BC2 Single Player Levels

  1. Operation Aurora
  2. Cold War
  3. Heart of Darkness
  4. Upriver
  5. Crack the Sky
  6. Snowblind
  7. Heavy Metal
  8. High Value Target
  9. Sangre del Toro
  10. No One Gets Left Behind
  11. Zero Dark Thirty
  12. Force Multiplier
  13. Airborne

Hope that helps. Richtofen Doc. Richtofen 17:59, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

A message to the Battlefield Assistance Task Force

To all members of the Battlefield Assistance Task Force (and User:Peter Griffen Boy)


I understand that soon, some of you are going to be moving on to other wikis or returning to CoD wiki.

I just wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you very much from myself and all of the native editing team, your contributions have improved this wiki exponentially and without your help, god knows where we'd be heading.

I also wanted to clarify that you are all welcome to stay for as long as you like or return whenever you want. Battlefield Wiki is always open to you all.


From Bondpedia and all the members of Battlefield Wiki

Bondpedia (Talk) 19:59, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Admin

I have offered an upgrade to User:DEathgod65. Thank you for your suggestion. - Bondpedia (Talk) 16:47, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship

See Battlefield Wiki:Requests for Adminship - Bondpedia (Talk) 19:16, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

I've deleted the page you noted, and I'll update your stats - Bondpedia (Talk) 15:46, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Issue

I was going to have a word, but the apology on User:Sactage's talk page seems sufficient to me. I'm guessing just a difference of opinion. But any continuation of this impromptue conflict by either side and I'll have to start warning people. I appreciate your under strain, and I fully understand, I did my own GCSEs last year, and I'm doing AS exams soon, I know how tough it is. Even more reason for putting the admin request on hold if you ask me. I've left him a similar message if you want to read. - Bondpedia (Talk) 20:50, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Sorry

It's fine. I've been under a huge amount of stress myself lately, but for different reasons. Well, I hope we can stay out of future conflicts with each other! File:Anim-tactical-nukeemblem.gifSactage Talk 20:54, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

OK, good luck yourself. If it's OK, I'll archive your RfA to the relevant place, then you can start a new one as and when you want - Bondpedia (Talk) 21:01, May 5, 2010 (UTC)


Makes sense. Just saying, once you pass around 500 edits, I'll support you in an RfA. You are a great editor, just not experienced enough yet. File:Anim-tactical-nukeemblem.gifSactage Talk 21:02, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

I agree, when the pressure's off, maybe you can bring your edit count up and apply again. Again, good luck with your exams, and I hope you do apply again in the future - Bondpedia (Talk) 21:06, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Advertisement